Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 review
Published: August 19, 2022

Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 review
Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 review

After testing Samsung smartwatches, I'm usually left with a furrowed brow, wondering what could have been. It's not because they're bad, ugly, or a pain to wear. Actually, it's the opposite. Hands down, Samsung's smartwatches are the best Android users can buy right now, and the $279.99 Galaxy Watch 5 is no exception. (Though that may change once the Google Pixel Watch arrives.) If Samsung would fix one, maybe two, things, its smartwatches would make the Apple Watch yesterday's news. I was hoping to report that Samsung had finally nailed it, but for better or worse, the Watch 5 is more of the same.

I don't mean this figuratively. The Watch 5 is nearly identical to its predecessor, the Galaxy Watch 4. It comes in the same 40mm and 44mm sizes. Aside from a few new strap colors, it looks the same. I've spent years reviewing nearly every smartwatch under the sun, and strap color is the only way I could spot the difference between my Watch 4 and 5 review units at a glance.

The Watch 5 also has many of the same specs as the Watch 4, including the Exynos W920 processor, 1.5GB of RAM, 16GB of internal storage, contactless payments, GPS, optional LTE, contactless payments, and 5ATM of water resistance. You get the same health features via the slightly improved 3-in-1 BioActive sensor, heart rate tracking, ECGs, body composition analysis. Hardware-wise, the only new thing you're getting is an infrared temperature sensor. That, by the way, doesn't do much of anything yet. It will allegedly improve sleep tracking accuracy, but as Samsung said during Unpacked, it added the sensor so developers can tinker around creating future health features. As far as software goes, it also runs Wear OS Powered by Samsung (aka Wear OS 3 running a Samsung skin). The Galaxy Watch 5 Pro, which ships alongside the Watch 5 on August 26th, is where you'll see new design choices and snazzy features like turn-by-turn navigation, but the Watch 5 is a very vanilla update.

I doubt most people will notice the handful of tweaks Samsung has made. The 40mm and 44mm watches are a bit heavier, about the weight of a penny, because they have slightly larger batteries. It's got a curvier back to ensure better skin contact for greater accuracy. That curved back doesn't really change how it feels on your wrist. Samsung claims it's 9.8mm thick, but YouTuber DC Rainmaker found that it's actually closer to 13mm when you include the sensor bump. But really, you won't notice it. The Watch 5 also uses sapphire crystal glass for greater durability. That's great, but it won't be appreciated by anyone who isn't a klutz, an adventurer, or an adventurous klutz.

Of course, there are new watchface options, too. Some will catch your eye. Some won't. I happen to dig that you can now add complications to the blobby number face. The new purple dragon face appeals to me, as I'm on a purple gadget kick and a dragon in the Chinese zodiac. But if you don't like a new (or old) watchface, you'll hardly notice it's there because you won't use it.

The Watch 5 is the definition of an iterative update, but I'd be remiss if I didn't call out two much-needed improvements.

The most obvious change is that you no longer have to endure Bixby. On-watch Google Assistant was a vague promise when the Galaxy Watch 4 launched last August, but it finally arrived a few months ago. The first thing I did once I unboxed and charged the Watch 5 was download Google Assistant and reprogram the Home button to launch that instead of Bixby. The second thing I did was download Google Wallet, Strava, Spotify, Calm, and a handful of other popular apps. This instantly made for a better experience because I was no longer shackled to Samsung Health, Samsung Pay, Bixby, or Samsung SmartThings. (The Galaxy Wearable app, however, is nonnegotiable.) I can use Strava to track my runs, Google Assistant to control my smart home, and Google Wallet to pay at the drugstore. While the Watch 4 was very much a Samsung smartwatch, the Watch 5 is less so.

To be clear, the Watch 5 is still better if you're on a Samsung phone. For starters, the ECG function only works with Samsung phones, and you'd need a half-dozen third-party apps to replicate all the wellness and fitness features of Samsung Health on a non-Samsung phone. Samsung Pay is also hardcoded as a shortcut when you long-press the back button, and there doesn't seem to be a way to reprogram it to launch Google Wallet instead. One UI Watch 4.5, Samsung's watch interface on top of Watch OS, also gives the Watch 5 the ability to have two phone numbers, but only if it's paired to a Galaxy phone with dual-SIM support. But if I want to flip Bixby the finger or download half a dozen apps to replace Samsung Health, the Play Store is my oyster. It's not ideal, but it's progress from last year and the year before that.

Speaking of One UI Watch 4.5, the updated interface adds a ton of new accessibility features and puts them all in one easy-to-find menu. Some of the new features include visibility enhancements, like high-contrast fonts, color filters, color correction, and the ability to toggle animations or blur effects. You can also tweak Bluetooth headphone settings to adjust the audio balance between each ear. (Though, you can't do this during calls.) Samsung's also added the ability to adjust tap duration and disable repeated taps.

As a hearing, able-bodied person, I can't speak authoritatively about how well all of these accessibility features work in everyday life. However, the visibility enhancements significantly improved my ability to read on the 40mm Watch 5. I was born with eyeballs so cursed my eye doctor said “sometimes you have to settle for good enough” when I got my last prescription. I'm also someone with small wrists. As a reviewer, I'm so tired of having to choose between a small watch that's comfortable to wear and a humongous watch that has an easy-to-read screen. My vision and wrist size aren't things I can control, but it's almost comical how much of a difference high-contrast fonts and adding a color filter made. Wearables have a long way to go on the readability front, and I wish more smartwatch makers would follow Samsung's lead here.

Samsung also made it easier to type on small screens with new keyboard inputs. You can now use dictation, handwriting, and swipe-to-type options. Your mileage may vary, however. I found dictation and handwriting to be useful, but swiping to type on a 40mm screen is just not ideal no matter how you slice it.

These are some major improvements, but I can't help but feel Samsung dropped the ball in a big way when it comes to the touch bezel and battery life.

The touch bezel mimics a physical bezel by letting you slide your finger around the rim of the display to scroll through menus. It was finicky on the Watch 4, but it almost seems worse on the Watch 5. I distinctly remember getting the hang of it on the Watch 4, but I struggled to do so again this year. (I always reached for the Watch 4 Classic whenever I needed to try out new features during the past year, so it's been a while.) If I swiped too quickly, tiles would zip by faster than my cat running for second breakfast. If I went too slowly, it wouldn't register at all. It was also much too easy for my finger to slip off the edge or outside the touch bezel area.

Technically, the Watch 5 doesn't need the touch bezel at all. Wear OS 3 might have some of Tizen's DNA, but the UI is missing the playfulness that Tizen had when it came to circular menus. Wear OS 3 can be easily navigated with directional swipes alone. (Taps and swipes didn't register quite as well on the Watch 5, either. That said, I attribute that to my fingers being sweatier than usual thanks to the recent heatwave.)

If you're wondering about upgrading from the Watch 4, I wouldn't unless you see a great deal or take advantage of a trade-in offer. You've already got what makes the Watch 5 great on your wrist and the battery improvements aren't good enough. It's a different story if you've got a Samsung phone and have been holding onto your Galaxy Watch Active or Active 2. Samsung will be ending support for these devices soon, you've been without a physical bezel this whole time so you won't miss it, and you're going to get a better overall experience on the Watch 5. Watch 3 and Watch 4 Classic owners should sit tight to see if Samsung realizes it goofed by not making a Watch 5 Classic.

If you're not already on a Samsung phone, you should wait to upgrade. The Watch 5 is the best you can buy right now, but that might change in a few short weeks. Google is launching the Pixel Watch this fall. Qualcomm's finally getting its act together with the Snapdragon W5 Plus platform, meaning Wear OS 3 watches might soon get an even more powerful chip than the one powering the Watch 5. That chip could very well power Fossil's next-gen smartwatches. And if you'd like to really take your time to see how the dust settles, certain Wear OS 2 watches are slated to get an optional upgrade to Wear OS 3 before the end of the year. Android users, y'all are about to get more smartwatch options than you've ever had before. The Galaxy Watch 5 isn't going anywhere. What's the rush?

Source: Re-posted and Summarized from Victoria Song at theverge.

Customer Reviews:

We all have been VERY pleased with Adrian's vigila
We all have been VERY pleased with Adrian's vigilance in monitoring the website and his quick and successful repairs. Evan was also very helpful in solving all of my hacking problems. So in all aspects of the Computer Geeks we are very glad we are working with you.
Kenneth Bruscia PhD
Published:
Kenneth Bruscia PhD
[email protected]
FIVE STARS + It's true, this is the place to go fo
FIVE STARS + It's true, this is the place to go for your web site needs. In my case, Justin fixed my problem immediately. It's such a comfort to know that I can reply on these people for any and all my web needs. You will not find a better team anywhere.
Paul Adler
Published:
Paul Adler
[email protected]
We reached out to Rich and his team at Computer Ge
We reached out to Rich and his team at Computer Geek in July 2021. We were in desperate need of help because our former website design agency left us hanging with major website issues that needed immediate attention. Rich and his team were extremely helpful and quick to come to our rescue! They have helped us with numerous projects that have helped our SEO. Our sales have increased 30% since coming to Computer Geek. We've been working with them for about nine months now and are very pleased with their response time and helpful manner. Rich has proven himself to be trustworthy and dependable. We feel valued as a customer and look forward to continuing a relationship with Computer Geek.
Leigh Hutchens
Published:
Leigh Hutchens
[email protected]
Just to say thank you for all the hard work. I can
Just to say thank you for all the hard work. I can't express enough how great it's been to send projects and they get done. Beyond that, your ability to work with three different folks in a personable way really has been a game changer for us. The improvements to our business because of your hard work have been significant.
Curtis Williams
Published:
Curtis Williams
[email protected]
I would certainly like to recommend that anyone pu
I would certainly like to recommend that anyone pursing maintenance for a website to contact The Computer Geek. I have been using another company to do some maintenance on my site with moderate success. There were issues that were evidently beyond what could be handled by them. However, the professionals at The Computer Geek had them addressed and rectified in no time at all. The Computer Geek approached all of my requests focusing on my goals and the needed performance. Then, once versed, presented me with a very reasonable price. Once the projects were in motion, I found that the tasks were achieved before I expected, with professional results. Also, in one instance where The Computer Geeks brought an issue to my attention that I would have likely overlooked. This was accompanied by a recommendation on how to solve the issue. Overall The Computer Geeks exceeded my expectations!
David Pappas
Published:
David Pappas
[email protected]
I have a important website dedicated to the local
I have a important website dedicated to the local high school going back nearly 100 years. It was suddenly infected with a virus. Rich at Computer Geek fixed it within an hour. I cannot recommend him enough. I hope it's not for a long time, but the next time I need help, Rich is who I'm gonna call.
Eric Williams
Published:
Eric Williams
[email protected]
WOW! I have been wracking my brain for the past 30
WOW! I have been wracking my brain for the past 30 days trying to figure out who was hosting my company's website the domain owner, etc. Yesterday, when I googled for help and I clicked on the link to computer-geek.net and picked up the phone and called them. Rich answered and from there it was smooth sailing!
Rhonda Harding
Published:
Rhonda Harding
[email protected]
A note to let you know how much I appreciate your
A note to let you know how much I appreciate your team's work. Justin is on top of quickly solving any issues, making changes, reliable. Finding you was one of the luckiest days of my 74 years. I'd be honored if you'd add me to your list of references. And please stay healthy and in business. I got enough headaches from other folks.
Dan Cutrer
Published:
Dan Cutrer
[email protected]
We discovered an issue with our Oscommerce cart pr
We discovered an issue with our Oscommerce cart processing images. It is about 14 years old and heavily modified. Looking on google for some expert help I found Rich and reached out to him. We received a response the same day. The next day his team was working on our issue and was able to solve it within a few hours. Price was reasonable and we are very appreciative to find a competent and professional oscommerce expert to help successfully troubleshoot our issue.
Phillip Sirota
Published:
Phillip Sirota
[email protected]
I'm very new to the whole idea of having a website
I'm very new to the whole idea of having a website / blog. I used Bluehost.com and WordPress.org to create Thepredatorhunter.com and then managed to wreck it. On a Sunday morning I opened chat box with Rich and within a few hours everything was fantastic! This isn't just a company for big biz, if your new and small, The Computer Geek can help you out. In trouble? Stop fretting and start typing in the chat box. You will be glad you did!
Dennis Gilmore
Published:
Dennis Gilmore
[email protected]
[Read More Testimonials Here]

Latest Website Related Articles

Microsoft wants to help you build a website with Copilot AI

Published: May 24, 2023
Microsoft wants to help you build a website with Copilot AI. Microsoft has added AI enhancements to its low-code website-building offering, Power Pages. Announced at its Microsoft Build conference, Copilot in Power Pages lets website developer">website developers...[Read More]

 

Windows 11 suffers from a weird bug that messes with hard drives

Published: May 22, 2023
Windows 11 suffers from a weird bug that messes with hard drives. Microsoft has confirmed that Windows 11 users are also experiencing an odd bug with SATA hard drives that have already been witnessed plaguing Windows 10 (and indeed Windows 8.1 and...[Read More]

 


Here are some links to related topics:
 webpage troubleshoot,   php engineer,   all in one wordpress security,   ideahost hacked,   xcart hacked,   ehost hacked,  


Auto Helpers: Auto Helpers
Site Secured By The Website Guardian